-
A Sister shared this with me & I found it rather interesting especially with the word play, very interesting.
5 Comments-
92,378
Abibisika (Black Gold) Points
Meanwhile I’m reality the first mention of Israel was as an enemy of Black people and it had nothing to do with this concoction: https://www.abibitumi.com/shop/what-was-israel-in-relation-to-black-people-the-danger-of-a-single-story/-
I could be flawed in my take on this but I think what is being conveyed here is a esoteric explanation( from a metaphysical perspective) and not promoting krakkka arabs who turned jews. I’ve looked into quite a few info including urs which is very informative. I realize that our history is scattered all over and not just in one place and that the enemy can’t hide everything and the pieces of the puzzle will be placed together eventually. Like u said the danger of a single story, it’s more than a single story it’s actually many stories. Also wording is everything, english language is very limited so they have to steal, & also manipulate and play with words. They read from left to right while some read from right to left and get a different meaning. The enemy was able to copy and paste certain esoteric stuff & scatter them all over in several different languages, but like I said they can’t hide everything because many of us even though our Mother tongue isn’t english we can figure it out or even transform it to what we want, because just like our Ancient Ancestors with their great ingenuity & Knowledge came up with many things, we can too.
-
-
Ye man I understand that but who made up these primary sources, how did they come about to begin with? I’m not justifying the post am just highlighting it’s interesting and the word play also. It can be very well be made up for sure but so can other information we’ve come to learn about & accept because it is saying what we want to hear, so it triggers a desired response to such information, thus it captures a certain audience. We can say primary sources but for Afrikan history which is so vast & enormous more than any other history because if we say we are the first peoples it would mean we also have info scattered all over the world & not just in Afrika, so to be limited to just a certain primary source, is somewhat have a sectarian view, but I understand if we don’t see us as the true custodians of the whole planet like how we see us for only Afrika. Our contribution to civilization can’t go unnoticed, there is evidence of us all over the planet even in places we think the krakkka originated from, we were there first. Even in the bible we were before the so call god who claimed he created the planet. All religious groups & secret societies did was try to copy from our Ancient mystery systems but they didn’t understand it so they took certain myths etc & historicalized them for political gains to control people. They were able to corrupt many things but we are slowly decoding.
-
I agree, there is also a school of thought that what the greeks came up with was taken from our people, so things come full circle if we say we were the first peoples. I think all these things are based on a person or persons own personal experience, interpretation and account which is always up for discussion even if it is carved in stone. The greeks copied many of our greats and made them into their own philosophies. Unless am mistaken and we were not the first peoples. Who were the peoples the greek saw and either conquered or assimilated with? Did KMT peoples traveled the planet and left their influence everywhere they stopped? Is the primary sources or whats carved in stone infallible? Forgive me for I ask a lot of questions.
-
True my Brother ur right, a flawed analysis on my end, will stick to primary sources as suggested. big ups
-
