-
https://abibitumitv.com/watch/VgrXY6JKkwpvyGA
abibitumitv.com
The Myth of the One Drop Rule | Who Gets to Define Blackness? | Defining Blackness | One Drop Rule
Do you think its time we do away with the One Drop Rule? What happens when we accept the one drop rule concept? Who is defining blackness for black people? Join the Live Conversation! Be sure to follow me on … Continue reading
6 Comments-
-
88,888
Abibisika (Black Gold) Points
Listening now.
-
88,888
Abibisika (Black Gold) Points
I don’t talk in terms of “passing for white,” I talk in terms of failing for Black.
I think we may need a deck of cards level of typology to add to bedroom colonialism. In this talk you deal with how some nHsyw (in the sense of those who phenotypically qualify as Km, but whose primary self-identificatory demonym is otherwise) actively seek out aAmw. In colonialism, though there are/were collaborators, it wasn’t actively sought out. We may need terms to accurately capture this type of phenomenon as well where the action diverges from what the concept describes. What do you think?-
Aane.
I recall an exchange I observed where it was said, we shouldn’t be thinking “they have black in em” (in terms of admixture), rather you should be turned off by “too much white”.
But “failing for Black” would be more accurate to the problem they were describing.
-
88,888
Abibisika (Black Gold) Points
It would have been interesting if this discussion went into other types of mulattofication; ideological mulattos, religious mulattos, and other vectors of compromise. Especially in terms of the overlaps – how biogenetic mulattos veer towards ideological mulattofication (marxism) because that ideology protects their krakkka parents.
-
-
“failing for Black” I like that.
-
-
