-
I did this a while back, though incomplete here this is a simple sample. I have numerous instances of C1 *k > k, and the Medew Neter (Classical Kemet) reconstruction C1 *k would appear different than the conventional Gardiner transliteration < x >. For this series, I have at least over 25 regular correspondences, where I can posit Medew Nete r C1 *k, instead of Gardiner conventional < x > because of the sound regularity of the extant Black languages (Dogon Tommo So 3-4000 ya, Nubian Dongolawi 1000 ya, and the SW Dinka including Sahidic Coptic). This would probably lead to an ancestral proto-Negro-Egyptian reconstruction of *k with probable aspirated variations phonologically.
Semitic languages like Arabic have < wajah > face, or < ‘anf > nose, or < ‘amam > front, and Hebrew < panim > face, in the Akkadian < panu > face, front part. As I have observed, the Semitic languages do not correspond within this series because Semitic languages are derived from a Semitic parent system. Borrowings between basic vocabulary do occur but not as frequently as cultural lexicology, thus basic items are the preferred choice when doing linguistic comparative analysis.
Kwame-
Thank you for this <kota zo> (Sango for big bro) 💪🏾✊🏾
-
dwA dwA
-
-