-
I recently wrote an article on how people can combat the system of racism (White supremacy) that’s persecuting the Black collective. Check it out below:
https://www.patreon.com/posts/98069681?utm_campaign=postshare_creator
Feel free to send this to anyone who asks, “what can I do?”
NonMwenSe21 Comments-
The solution to combat the system of racism (white supremacy):
EXTERMINATE THE NUMBER ONE PROBLEM OFF THE FACE OF THE EARTH.
4-
Honestly, until we are in a position to back up that talk I don’t think we should proclaim it.
-
Facts.
But we still have to make that our Declaration as Black=Afrikan people.
-
77,838
Abibisika (Black Gold) Points
@Nduku, sounds like you’ve been bitten by the Ubuntu bug.
-
-
-
77,838
Abibisika (Black Gold) Points
I thought there was just that one bedbug that you told me about previously, but if there were a lot of them then I’m sure you know the full story better than me.
At any rate, I’ve never heard Mama Marimba say anything like that either verbally or in writing, so if you have a link you can share, I’d love to check it out.
-
-
I noted this part on your page.
“people of color, especially Black people, ought to adopt a counter-racist code of conduct.”
People of color and Black people should not be in the same sentence.
Who exactly are people of color? Is that how they refer to themselves?
Conclusion:
In summary, the system of racism (White supremacy) ought to be replaced with a system of justice. This refers to one in which no person or group is maltreated, and the people that need the most help get it. This would include a system that incorporates the 4 Rs:
1) Ensures the recognition of the harm.
2) Encourages remorse for the harm.
3) Whites need to be rehabilitated from the sickness of their racism via re-education and therapy.
4) Repair the harm (e.g., Bill HR-40 reparations legislation for Blacks). Learn more about repair strategies here:
What part of this has not already been explained before? Nana Amos Wilson has done an excellent job in explaining this. I recall him saying, and I paraphrase, we can psycho-babble all we want to but at the end of the day white people do what they cause they can do it.
They are not concerned with the recognition of the harm, or encouraging remorse, this is not part of their culture. White need to be rehabilitated, rehabilitated to what? A more loving human being? They have no religion nor spiritual system that allows them to grow at all.
Implying that they are sick implies that at one time they were wholesome, kind, nurturing people that maintained balance with the others and nature. That they have taken time to build a culture that emphasizes humanity and minimizes war. They have not done that.
Who will rehabilitate them? The Chinese? The Indians? Vietnamese? Japanese?
Whose responsibility will it be to rehabilitate them? And that is a question after determining that they want to be rehabilitated as a group.
I have lived 6 countries and have observed them in their native habitats. They are not interested in changing, in all areas of human activities which as I have noted seems quite similar to Neely Fullers Counter-racist code.
What about just leaving the states? You have suggested everything else besides leaving the states and returning to Africa=Black people, KMT and contributing there. And it appears you have written about the Wazungu that are living in the states, what about those living in Australia? South Africa? Namibia? Botswana?
They took their sweet times planting seeds and it is time they ate the fruit from them. They must reap what they sow.
3 -
-
-
-
With all due respect I don’t think this is practical nor logical. If enough of us actually tried to enact this plan it would be a lot of efforts aimed at gaining very little “advancements” while continuing to set ourselves up for further “assimilation” and alienation.
It doesn’t look like there are many of us that are actually going to really be about creating the world that we want. The very few of us who actually want to make the world a better place must have a plan that is focused on real definite solutions.
There is a lot that can be addressed here but I’ma try to keep this short.Economics:
I don’t think any significant form of reparations if any will happen. Nope. Impossible. They will rather go out gun-blazing.
With that said:I think “asking” for reparations period is weak but that might just be me.
And y’all didn’t even bring up land. Talking about reparations and only talking about cash etc and not land doesn’t make any sense.
The people asking for reparations: on what grounds?
If no reparations, what y’all gonna do about it? Where is y’all “or else”?I don’t think the argument for reparations for the “initial enslavement” of our people in the USA (or anywhere else in this case) can stand in court. “Technically”, that was war and “business transactions” did take place in a lot of those cases between a “buyer” and a “seller”. Not to mention if y’all go that route, where does it end? What about the “Natives” etc? This was (and is still) war. How do y’all plan to account for this?
But after “Emancipation” up until the present? That’s where y’all got a case.
“American Descendants of Slaves”? That “identification” is just wrong on a variety of levels.
$300,000? That’s lowballing it (and y’all didn’t mention land) but how can a death-trap of an economy such as that of the USA’s realistically even address this even if they wanted to without further manipulation and exploitation of their own “citizens” and the rest of the world?
How can this be addressed by a system that is designed to have almost all of the money – as much of it as possible- in the hands of only a few people while it drowns in debt and hyperinflation?
Y’all asking for a system that doesn’t exist. Y’all making “demands” (with no power behind it to boot) that this system can’t meet. Y’all want to try to fix a system that isn’t broken when y’all can be using y’all efforts to create y’all own systems.
1-
“American Descendant of Slaves”
My mind immediately turned off once I saw that “identification” for Black=Afrikan people.
Today when anyone says the word ‘slave’ they automatically think Black=Afrikan people.
The word ‘slave’ is now a word that is used to broad paint all Afrikan=Black people as slaves, and as usual, Black=Afrikan people have internalized that word.
Initially that word “slave” was meant for white people.
It was meant for white people enslaving other white people; Arabs enslaving white people.
The word “slave” was never meant for Afrikan=Black people. The word “slave” was only meant for white people. That is why today, the word
“slave” is still used to describe white people.
Slavic people
YugoSlavia
CzechoSlovakia
Slavia
Slavenia
Slavakia
Why are they called Slavs?
The word for slave in Medieval Latin is Slavus, which is the etymology of Slavic. The reason why this term was chosen for what we now call the Slavic people is that this region of Europe was once the source of slaves for people in other parts of Europe.
What are the Slavic tribes?
the West Slavs (chiefly Czechs, Kashubians, Poles, Slovaks, Silesians and Sorbs); the East Slavs (chiefly Belarusians, Russians, Rusyns, and Ukrainians); the South Slavs (chiefly Bosniaks, Bulgarians, Croats, Gorani, Macedonians, Montenegrins, Serbs, and Slovenes).
Slavic people
Yugoslavia YugoSlavia
CzechoSlovakia
Slavia
Slavenia
Slavakia
What country are Slavs?
… nations we know today as Belarus, Bosnia, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Macedonia, Montenegro, Poland, Russia, Serbia, Slovenia, Slovakia, and Ukraine.
The Slavs=Slaves are Indo-European peoples.
The Slavs=Slaves are not Afrikan=Black people.
1-
Yup. Well said. This must be known.
-
Will do.
-
-
77,838
Abibisika (Black Gold) Points
I deal with with this point here https://www.abibitumi.com/shop/400-years-enduring-historical-misorientation-and-disorientation-and-the-year-of-return/
-
-
-
Education:
The history of “Kemet” is important but let’s be real, this fixation on “Kemet” is because of “europe’s” fixation on “Kemet”.
We need to ask ourselves: What does a Black perspective on history actually look like?
We stay talking about “Kemet” while ignoring everything else. Our scholarship (in recent times) stay following “them”. We mostly talk about what they talk about. We mostly study what they study. We mostly value the parts of history that they value. And to make matters worst? We spend a lot of those efforts trying to battle against very obvious and egregious fabrications. We mostly go around following them to try to point out their (obvious) lies. All in our efforts to be accepted by them. Can you imagine writing countless books to try to convince “the world” (we all should know what that means) that the sky is blue?
We don’t think what we say is true unless they say the same thing as well. We don’t think what we say is true unless we can get them to say it’s true.It’s embarrassing.
To say the least.
1-
Facts. 💯
I really believe that the reason why a lot of Black=Afrikan people are so fixated and infatuated with ancient Kmt is because white people has put ancient Kmt on a high pedestal. There are many other great Afrikan=Kmt=Farafina=Abibiman high civilizations other than ancient Kmt.
If you asked many of the Kmt cult enthusiasts to name any other Afrikan=Kmt=Abibiman=Farafina
civilizations on the Motherland, they won’t be able to name you one besides ancient Kmt, because white Eurocentric education has programmed in their minds to believe ancient Kmt was the only high civilization on the Continent, The Motherland.
1
-
-
And you want non-black people to admit and accept and teach their children that they are a disease to this world? You expect them to agree to that?
Free colleges? Not in this system. Capitalism is showing no signs of slowing down. If there ever is free colleges in the USA there will certainly be strings attached.
1 -
We just need to build our own schools. Our own paradigms etc etc. And a good place where we can (a lot more) easily accomplish that is the Motherland.
-
Medaase. I see y’all, trust. For this one my contributions will likely be from a distance but I already have a few ideas for the three-peat.
-
Jermaine, I will put this frankly, you can not make wazungu moral or human. What you have proposed is futile.
-
@Nduku
With all due respect, there are contradictions in what you have said.
You agree to destroy the systems that they have created.
You agree that they should be kicked out of the Motherland.
But going to war against them is where you draw the line?
How many times will this history repeat itself.
But at the same time you bought up an example of one of them being someone you can get along with?
If that’s the case then why do you agree that they should be kicked out? Shouldn’t that person you bought up be “proof” to you that you can get along with them?And systems are created by people. All the things you want to fight against, all the things you said you want to get rid of are from them.
You want to get rid of a problem but yet think there is something wrong with getting rid of the source of the problem. In other words, you want to get rid of the webs but not the spider. You said you don’t want the spider to be dwelling where you are, though. But, aren’t we all on the same planet?
And war is certainly our way. Terrorism is not. Let’s not confuse the two.
I don’t appreciate how people be trying to reduce our Cultures. We need to wake up.
Our way is to establish and protect order in accordance to our worldview. And when a disease shows up at your doorsteps, you kill it. Unless you just want it to kill you.
You bringing up an individual is one of the deceits a lot of us need to stop falling for. Why don’t all those “individuals” go and establish a country where they are from that isn’t built on exploitation? Wait, that’s never happened before? I wonder why.
With all due respect, I think this indecisiveness, this contradiction has been and continues to be the obstacle that has kept the maafa going. For every Dessaline, there is a L’ouverture trying to get along with the enemy while at the same time trying to fight against it. This compromise is a major and perhaps our only weakness.
And the maafa continues.
1
-
